rodion kutsaiev jqCdQNhl4AI unsplash
09 January 2025

Why 90% of Start-ups Fail and How Backing Great Leaders Beats the Odds

Understanding the Start-up Failure Rate (and the Story Behind the Stats)

  • Strong founders mitigate failure by adapting, managing finances, and building solid teams.
  • Boxfund focuses on founder resilience and leadership capacity.
  • Provides hands-on support post-investment to help startups avoid common pitfalls.

It’s often said that 90% of start-ups fail, and unfortunately this statistic holds true. According to research by Startup Genome, about 90% of start-ups fail within the first three years of operation [wearefounders.uk]. This high failure rate can be discouraging, but digging into why start-ups fail offers valuable lessons. The most common causes of start-up failure include lack of market need, running out of cash, and team problems. A CB Insights analysis found that the #1 reason (cited by 35% of failed start-ups) was “no market need” – essentially building a product no one really wants [rydoo.com]. The second most cited reason was running out of cash (lack of funding or poor cash management) [rydoo.com]. Other frequent culprits were getting outcompeted, pricing issues, and not the right team in place.

It’s notable that many of these factors are interrelated. For example, if the team is weak, they may misjudge the market need or burn through cash inefficiently. A start-up might fail to find product-market fit (a market need issue) because the leadership couldn’t iterate the product effectively (a team capability issue). In fact, ineffective leadership and team dysfunction underpin a significant share of failures. McKinsey has reported that nearly a quarter of start-up failures stem from poor leadership and management practices [rydoo.com]. When founders lack the necessary skills or teams fall into internal conflict, even ample funding or a promising market can’t save the venture. Clearly, improving a start-up’s odds isn’t just about more capital or better ideas, it’s fundamentally about building a team capable of executing and adapting.

Most important factors in startup success and failure. A survey of 513 VCs showed the founding team was by far the most cited factor in startup success (56% of respondents) and in failure (55%), far outweighing factors like business model or market timing [linkedin.com]. This highlights how critical a strong team and leadership are to beating the start-up odds.

The Leadership Factor: Mitigating Failure through Strong Founders

Given that so many start-up post-mortems point to team and leadership problems, Boxfund tackles the failure rate head-on by backing founders with proven leadership capacity. The idea is simple, a strong leader can identify and address the other pitfalls before they cause collapse. Let’s examine how capable founders mitigate common failure modes:

No Market Need: An experienced, customer-focused founder will test assumptions early and often. Rather than stubbornly executing a flawed idea, they’ll pivot when evidence shows a lack of demand. Many start-ups fail because they build a “solution looking for a problem.” A strong founder mitigates this by actively seeking market feedback and being willing to change course. They ensure the venture is solving a real pain point. In other words, they won’t fall in love with the product over the problem, they’ll iterate until they achieve product-market fit. This agility can turn a near-failure into a success story.

Running Out of Cash: Financial mismanagement is a startup killer [rydoo.com], but a savvy founder plans for runway and frugality. Leaders who have weathered past ventures know how to budget, control burn rate, and raise funds at the right time. They build investor trust by being transparent and hitting milestones. By contrast, an inexperienced founder might overspend on vanity projects or be caught flat-footed when it’s time to fundraise. Boxfund looks for founders who demonstrate fiscal discipline and resourcefulness, ensuring that every pound of investment is stretched toward value-creating milestones.

Team Dysfunction: Start-ups often fail due to co-founder disputes, turnover, or lack of the right skills, all symptoms of ineffective leadership. A founder with strong leadership skills will hire smartly, foster a healthy culture, and unite the team under a common vision. They are proactive about filling skill gaps and managing conflicts. Research confirms how vital this is, in a survey of 500+ VCs on start-up success, 56% highlighted the team (and its leadership) as the top factor for success, and equally 55% said team issues were the primary reason for failure, far above any other cause [linkedin.com]. Great founders mitigate this by inspiring and retaining talent, and by creating an environment where everyone works toward the same goal. Boxfund specifically seeks founders who have demonstrated team-building and leadership capacity, whether through previous start-ups, corporate roles, or other achievements, as a way to stack the deck against failure.

Adaptability and Learning: One reason many start-ups fail is that they fail to learn, they stick to a failing strategy or ignore feedback. A high-calibre founder, however, is a lifelong learner. They show humility and curiosity, iterating the business based on data and advice. For example, if a marketing approach isn’t yielding results, a good leader will experiment with new channels rather than exhausting the budget on a failing tactic. This learning mindset can save a start-up from the brink by unlocking a strategy that works before the money runs out. Boxfund values founders who are coachable and open-minded, a trait that significantly improves survival odds.

Boxfund’s Approach: Betting on Resilience and Track Record

Boxfund applies these insights in its investment process. Rather than being dazzled solely by a cool product or a huge target market, the team scrutinises the founder’s background and capacity. Has this person demonstrated resilience? Do they understand the industry’s realities? Can they attract others to work with them? Often, founders with prior start-up experience (even if those start-ups failed) have learned invaluable lessons that make them more likely to succeed on subsequent tries. There is evidence that previously successful entrepreneurs have higher odds of success in their next venture [innospective.net], but even a past failure can teach resourcefulness and grit. Boxfund doesn’t require a founder to have a big prior exit, but they do look for signs of leadership credibility, for instance, maybe the founder led a team in a tough environment or achieved significant traction on a shoestring budget. These are indicators of the kind of person who can beat the 90% odds.

Importantly, Boxfund also helps mitigate risks post-investment by being a hands-on, high-value partner. The firm embraces a model of active support, mentoring founders on strategy, connecting them to a network of advisors and industry contacts, and even rolling up their sleeves when necessary. This support can fill experience gaps and prevent the common mistakes that cause failure. As an example, if a first-time founder is struggling with cash flow planning, Boxfund’s team (which has decades of operational experience) will step in to help refine the financial model and maybe secure bridge financing if needed. It’s a safety net of expertise that complements the founder’s own abilities.

Lessons for Founders: Be Part of the 10%

For entrepreneurs, the high failure rate of start-ups should not be a deterrent but rather a guide for where to focus your improvement. Knowing that leadership and team quality are pivotal, invest in yourself and your team’s development as much as your product. Seek mentors, educate yourself on financial literacy, and build a company culture that can endure hard times. Cultivate the ability to listen, to customers, to employees, to advisors. This trait will help you catch signs of “no market need” or other issues early, giving you a chance to pivot and survive. Remember that almost every successful start-up went through near-death experiences, the difference is the founders who steered through them.

For investors, the takeaway is clear, mitigating start-up failure is not about trying to predict the future with spreadsheets, it’s about choosing founders who can handle whatever the future brings. Boxfund’s strategy of backing proven leaders demonstrates that by stacking your portfolio with resilient, smart, and adaptable founders, you tilt the odds in your favour. In an ecosystem where 90% may fail, those founders will find a way to be the 10% that succeed, or die trying.